Pause: Stepping up to lead the Domain Name Association


I have now launched many successful conference brands – MERGE, NamesCon, DomainFest, DotNXT and The Domain Roundtable – and NamesCon rapidly grew to become the leading conference in the Domain Name Industry, now operating in the very capable hands of GoDaddy’s Cloudfest team.

My focus will now be towards leading the Domain Name Association as the executive director of that important trade association for the great industry of Domain Names.  In addition, and in compliment to that activity, I will continue as a volunteer with the Public Suffix List (and related efforts) helping developers better interact with domain names.

I also contribute to the Universal Acceptance efforts, where Internationalized Domain Names and EAI (Email that works in more native languages), and helping countries with their ccTLDs.

I continue to consult registries, registrars, and related parties interested in the industry of Domain Names, and also own and operate a small ICANN-Accredited Registrar.  The focus is high quality registration of domain names, and working within the new regulations on GDPR or other such regulations, and efforts on “Know Your Customer” (KYC) and quality registrant experience.

You’ll see more activity in those areas and less activity here on my personal blog.

The Public Suffix List

The Public Suffix List (PSL) is a large, detailed list of Top Level Domains and their descendants or self-designated work-alikes, designed to aid programmers, integrators, sysadmins, security experts, email administrators, browsers, search engines, data scientists and other developers more elegant and detailed domain boundary resources.

The Domain Name Association

The Domain Name Association works to engage, educate and evangelize about the benefits, utility and innovation potential of domain names, the DNS and Top Level Domains as crucial Internet resources.

Taking a break…

I am taking a break from blogging and will be reducing my industry profile in the coming months to work on something big.

Thank you to all of the loyal viewers, syndicators, fans, and friends over the years.

To quote Arnold Schwartzenegger, “Ahl Beh Back”.

Today We Call Out Sedo For Including Escrow Only Transactions In It’s Sales Figures has been including domain names it acts only as escrow agent for in its weekly and annual reports of domain sales.

This information came to light this week when Sedo inadvertently reported a sale that was supposed to be confidential and Francois from Domaining left a comment on telling us that not only should have the sale been confidential but that only acted as Escrow agent for the transaction.

We reached out to Sedo which confirmed that its served solely as the escrow agent in the domain name in question.

In our opinion Sedo should not include domain names in their weekly sales report in which they only act as escrow agent.

There are two major problems IMHO with including escrow only sales in their weekly sales reports.

For one the Sedo weekly report as it is transmitted to blogs and other news sources weekly, including always starts with the following language:

“”Please find the weekly sales list attached. This past week there were a total of …….. sales through our marketplace, totaling over $………”

For us when someone handles solely the escrow function of receiving the funds and transferring the domain, its misleading to say the “sale took place through our marketplace”

It would be like claiming it sold $X number of dollars of domains every week because they cleared the transactions.

Unless a domain is sold through and by virtue of a broker or the online sales and purchase system, commonly referred to as a marketplace, the domain should not be claimed to be sold through the marketplace.

Secondly including such sales in Sedo numbers can result in the double reporting of sales.

For example if we at sell a domain for $5K and uses Sedo rather than to act as escrow agent the sale will be reported by us to us to and it will be reported by as well. Obviously if we sold the domain through instead of Sedo there would be no chance of double reporting.

We reached out to Sedo this week to discuss the issue who issued the following response:

“”Sedo has a policy of transparently sharing the percentage of external transfers that take place at our marketplace, and we publish those numbers as part of our quarterly and annual reports. ”

“In 2011 just 6% of all transactions were external transfers, which translates to only 2.3% of our published sales value (in dollars) for 2011.”

“External transfers are part of the marketplace, and we will continue to report them in our weekly marketplace report, and will also continue to transparently show the percentage volume in our quarterly and yearly reports (2011 report).”

“We will of course also continue to honor clients’ confidentiality requests, independently from the source of the transaction.…